<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Danavest.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danavest.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danavest.com</link>
	<description>What&#039;s the Price Now?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-09-08</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/08/trading-notes-for-2010-09-08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/08/trading-notes-for-2010-09-08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PLUS (5052)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Price opened at maintained at 4.15 for the first one hour, before heading downwards for most part of the day. As observed yesterday, the support level was 4.10, and price was actively testing this level today. The bears are trying to hard to bring price lower than 4.10, but the bulls were very determined to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price opened at maintained at 4.15 for the first one hour, before heading downwards for most part of the day.</p>
<p>As observed yesterday, the support level was 4.10, and price was actively testing this level today. The bears are trying to hard to bring price lower than 4.10, but the bulls were very determined to keep the support level in tact.</p>
<p>Shortly after 1600hrs, the bulls begin to took control of the situation and price started to surge to 4.18 before closing at 4.17, two sens above yesterday&#8217;s closing.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-08-PLUS-intraday-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-08-PLUS-intraday-chart" title="2010-09-08-PLUS-intraday-chart" width="800" height="379" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-195" /></p>
<p>The daily chart below shows that the uptrend would continue.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-08-PLUS-daily-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-08-PLUS-daily-chart" title="2010-09-08-PLUS-daily-chart" width="748" height="467" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-196" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/08/trading-notes-for-2010-09-08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-09-07</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/trading-notes-for-2010-09-07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/trading-notes-for-2010-09-07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bursa Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUS (5052)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Price stayed above yesterday&#8217;s closing price (4.16) for the first session, until at arond 1600hrs, where the bear got hold of the situtation, sending price down to 4.11, before the bulls pulled it back to 4.15, where it closed for the day. From the daily chart below, price hovered between 4.20 (resistance) and 4.10 (support). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Price stayed above yesterday&#8217;s closing price (4.16) for the first session,  until at arond 1600hrs, where the bear got hold of the situtation, sending price down to 4.11, before the bulls pulled it back to 4.15, where it closed for the day.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-07-PLUS-intraday-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-07-PLUS-intraday-chart" title="2010-09-07-PLUS-intraday-chart" width="800" height="349" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-188" /></p>
<p> From the daily chart below, price hovered between 4.20 (resistance) and 4.10 (support). The battle between the bulls and the bears are very fierce at the peak of price. Let&#8217;s see if the rally will continue.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-07-PLUS-daily-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-07-PLUS-daily-chart" title="2010-09-07-PLUS-daily-chart" width="649" height="465" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-189" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/trading-notes-for-2010-09-07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On-Balance Volume (OBV)</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/on-balance-volume-obv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/on-balance-volume-obv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alexander Elder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Balance Volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Wisdoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On-Balance Volume often rises or falls before prices- it acts as a leading indicator. The patterns of OBV tops and bottoms are more important than the absolute levels of this indicator. When OBV rises or falls together with prices, the trend is confirmed. OBV gives its strongest buy and sell signals when it diverges from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On-Balance Volume often rises or falls before prices- it acts as a leading indicator.</p>
<p>The patterns of OBV tops and bottoms are more important than the absolute levels of this indicator. When OBV rises or falls together with prices, the trend is confirmed.</p>
<p>OBV gives its strongest buy and sell signals when it diverges from prices.</p>
<p>Long-term divergences are more important than short-term divergences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/07/on-balance-volume-obv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-09-06</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/06/trading-notes-for-2010-09-06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/06/trading-notes-for-2010-09-06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PLUS (5052)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day of profit taking, but price was less volatile than yesterday. Price opened at 4.20, and tested the 4.22 level, before continue its downward spiral for the remaining of the day. I did not execute a sell at the 4.21 level, because I wasn&#8217;t holding a substantial amount and decided to see how it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another day of profit taking, but price was less volatile than yesterday. Price opened at 4.20, and tested the 4.22 level, before continue its downward spiral for the remaining of the day. I did not execute a sell at the 4.21 level, because I wasn&#8217;t holding a substantial amount and decided to see how it would play out throughout the day, to see how the profit takers would affect the price. This is somewhat a new experience as compared to GENM previously, where the price was relatively more predictable.</p>
<p>Another difference was, PLUS&#8217;s trading volume is considerably higher than my previous GENM trade. I checked to see if there was a similar increase in volume with GENM, and it seems that there is also a similar increase in trade volume. Seems like they are more players now in the game.</p>
<p>Price closed at 4.16, -0.952% lower than yesterday&#8217;s 4.20.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-06-PLUS-intraday-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-06-PLUS-intraday-chart" title="2010-09-06-PLUS-intraday-chart" width="800" height="346" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-178" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look at the daily chart. Uptrend seems to be still holding up (above 4.14). The resistance is at 4.20 and support at 4.10.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-06-PLUS-daily-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-06-PLUS-daily-chart" title="2010-09-06-PLUS-daily-chart" width="564" height="467" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-182" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/06/trading-notes-for-2010-09-06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-09-03</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/03/trading-notes-for-2010-09-03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/03/trading-notes-for-2010-09-03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PLUS (5052)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not exactly a very good start for September, as my entry point into PLUS at 4.14 yesterday proves to be rather untimely. As you can see from the intra-day chart above, the price took a good beating 20 minutes after the bell. The selling finally came to a halt at the 4.04 point, losing 0.10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly a very good start for September, as my entry point into PLUS at 4.14 yesterday proves to be rather untimely.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-03-PLUS-intraday-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-03-PLUS-intraday-chart" title="2010-09-03-PLUS-intraday-chart" width="617" height="397" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-169" /></p>
<p>As you can see from the intra-day chart above, the price took a good beating 20 minutes after the bell. The selling finally came to a halt at the 4.04 point, losing 0.10 in just the first trading session.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-03-PLUS-half-hourly-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-03-PLUS-half-hourly-chart" title="2010-09-03-PLUS-half-hourly-chart" width="726" height="599" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-172" /></p>
<p>In the 30-minutes chart above, we can observe how the volume was building up after the price touched the day&#8217;s lowest point (4.04). RSI was well below 50 for the most part of the day, and at 1600hrs, we see the MACD crosses each other, and it was followed by a spike (from 4.13 to 4.20). Momentum was below 100 for most part of the day.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-03-PLUS-daily-chart.gif" alt="2010-09-03-PLUS-daily-chart" title="2010-09-03-PLUS-daily-chart" width="781" height="603" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-174" /></p>
<p>From the daily chart above, the uptrend is still intact. But I will have to put a tight Stop Loss at the  4.21 resistance level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/03/trading-notes-for-2010-09-03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes 2010-09-02</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/02/trading-notes-2010-09-02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/02/trading-notes-2010-09-02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PLUS (5052)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Took a position in PLUS today at 4.14.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took a position in PLUS today at 4.14.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2010-09-02-PLUS.gif" alt="2010-09-02-PLUS" title="2010-09-02-PLUS" width="655" height="605" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-164" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/09/02/trading-notes-2010-09-02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-08-26</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/26/trading-notes-for-2010-08-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/26/trading-notes-for-2010-08-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bursa Malaysia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENM (4715)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned earlier, I decided to switch my trading from OSK to Jupiter Securities. As with all changes, I needed some time to get used to the toolkit. In the Charting section, I have to admit OSK&#8217;s platform is much more established and comprehensive. However, Jupiter has a better user interface and is a much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned earlier, I decided to switch my trading from <a href="http://www.osk188.com.my">OSK</a> to <a href="http://www.jupiteronline.com.my">Jupiter Securities</a>.</p>
<p>As with all changes, I needed some time to get used to the toolkit. In the Charting section, I have to admit OSK&#8217;s platform is much more established and comprehensive. However, Jupiter has a better user interface and is a much more user-friendly application. Price stats are also accompanies by visuals charts which makes it more &#8216;entertaining&#8217;. The historical data are hosted by NextView. Had some problems with the login process, but clearing the Temporary Internet Files and cache in Internet Explorer solves the glitch. Yes, you must run Jupiter&#8217;s trading platform via Internet Explorer. The Charting tools could really do with some more improvements, especially when it comes to adding trendlines and annotations. I noticed that each time I draw my trendlines, the lines would move unpredictably when the chart is updated, especially if I am charting on a 5-minutes chart. I would suggest that they do not refresh the chart until users manually click on the refresh button.</p>
<p>Now, back to the market.</p>
<p>I exited the market at 11th Aug at 2.80, taking a little profit. Tracking the next few days after I&#8217;ve exited, the price continue downwards to 2.73.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010-08-26-GENM.gif" alt="2010-08-26-GENM" title="2010-08-26-GENM" width="722" height="603" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-160" /></p>
<p>On 16th Aug, price closed at 2.84. On 17th Aug, price opened at 2.83, and shot up to close at 3.09 for the day.</p>
<blockquote><p>Two weeks ago (10th August), Genting Singapore said second quarter profit soared to S$396.5 million (RM916 million) from a loss of S$50.7 million (RM117 million) a year ago, while revenue surged to S$979.3 million (RM2.26 billion) from S$120.1 million (RM277 million) before. It also said EBITDA for the quarter was at S$513.9 million (RM1.19 billion) with margins of 52 per cent.</p>
<p>Read more: A tale of two Gentings http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/genx-2/Article/index_html#ixzz0xgloX358</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from <a href="http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_565962.html">Singapore&#8217;s Straits Times</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>ITS BATTLESTAR Galactica roller coaster may be grounded, but Genting Singapore shares rocketed 14 per cent to a record high of $1.46 a-share yesterday, after one of its busiest day of trading.</p>
<p>More than 683 million shares exchanged hands on Friday, which is almost seven-times the counter was traded on Thursday, when the gaming firm announced a blow out second quarter performance.</p>
<p>Earnings for Genting Singapore had shot up dramatically from a $51 million loss a year ago, to $396 million in profits in the three months ending Jun 30.</p>
<p>The better-than-expected result was driven by a spectacular showing from Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) &#8211; the firm&#8217;s crown jewel in Asia, and the first integrated resort (IR) to open its doors here.</p>
<p>RWS spokesman Robin Goh told The Straits Times that each month, more than a million people visit the IR, which houses among other attractions, the Universal Studios Singapore theme park, six hotels and the first casino here.</p>
<p>&#8216;Two-thirds of the guests to the casino are from overseas including Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, China and India,&#8217; said Mr Goh, who added that RWS remains on course to exceed its 13-million visitor target for 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p>Looking back, the spill-over effect from Genting Berhad was not entirely unanticipated, but I was out of the market for a short vacation. The uptrend last for a week, and price dropped below the uptrend line to close at 3.04 on 25th Aug. The blue line shows that price is testing the downward trend. It has not breached below that yet, but if it does, it signals that price will continue to slip.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now. By the way, Jupiter Securities only allows you to trade when you have cash in the account. So, make sure you wire your money into your account before you start ordering your &#8216;meals&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/26/trading-notes-for-2010-08-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-08-12</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/12/trading-notes-for-2010-08-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/12/trading-notes-for-2010-08-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GENM (4715)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GENM continues its downtrend. Opening at 2.77, the price continue to drop to 2.73, before closing the day at 2.74. Volume is relatively low for such drastic price movement, only 22K shares done. It was a good call to have sold at 2.80.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GENM continues its downtrend. Opening at 2.77, the price continue to drop to 2.73, before closing the day at 2.74. Volume is relatively low for such drastic price movement, only 22K shares done. It was a good call to have sold at 2.80.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010-08-12-GENM.gif" alt="2010-08-12-GENM" title="2010-08-12-GENM" width="646" height="507" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-152" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/12/trading-notes-for-2010-08-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trading Notes for 2010-08-11</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/11/trading-notes-for-2010-08-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/11/trading-notes-for-2010-08-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GENM (4715)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Online Trading Platforms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anticipated break-out into 2.90 did not materialize and sentiment weakened with low volume. Price continue to go south after the peak at 2.88. The peak was touched twice on 5th Aug, before the downtrend begins. As mentioned earlier, my support level was at 2.80, and if breached, I will dispose all inventories. And on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anticipated break-out into 2.90 did not materialize and sentiment weakened with low volume.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-146" title="2010-08-10-GENM" src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010-08-10-GENM.gif" alt="2010-08-10-GENM" width="780" height="545" /></p>
<p>Price continue to go south after the peak at 2.88. The peak was touched twice on 5th Aug, before the downtrend begins.</p>
<p>As mentioned earlier, my support level was at 2.80, and if breached, I will dispose all inventories. And on 10th Aug, around 10.15am, the support level was tested, and breached 2 hours later to 2.79. I had a Stop Loss order with the remisier, but I was curious why it wasn&#8217;t triggered. At this point of writing, you cannot execute a Stop Loss order automatically from the online trading pad&#8230;which I really detest. This is one of the most important risk management tool, yet it&#8217;s not available and accessible directly by retail/online investors. I cannot imagine how much profits was lost because investors could not alert their remisier to take profit when the pricing has reached their support levels. As the saying goes, anyone can enter the market, but it takes a professional to know when to exit.</p>
<p>I continue to follow up on the price&#8217;s movement for 10th Aug, and it went all the way down to 2.78 before closing at 2.80 for the day (16,957 shares done). The push is relatively weak with very little volume (4,000 shares).</p>
<p>It seems that the low volume for the past week is attributed to investors abstaining from the share market due to the beginning of the 7th Month (Chinese Lunar Calendar).</p>
<p><img src="http://www.danavest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010-08-11-GENM.gif" alt="2010-08-11-GENM" title="2010-08-11-GENM" width="738" height="651" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-148" /></p>
<p>As the market opened this morning, I managed to sell at 2.80 in the first 10 minutes, before price spiked temporarily to 2.81 (110 shares traded). After that, it&#8217;s all downhill, with the price dropping to 2.77. Minus all brokerage fees, I managed to make a meager 3.32% on this trade (6th July to 11 Aug). The brokerage fees involved is exorbitant.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> The OSK remisier was adamant to keep RM28.00 of brokerage fee per contract, which I think is too much- she adds very little value to the entire trading process. Besides, she wasn&#8217;t honest in her dealings. She promised that if I had money in the account and trades online, I could reduce my brokerage fee to  RM12.00 per contract. Next, she slapped an RM40.00 brokerage fee when I sold my holdings in GENM today, her reason being my total transaction is below RM7,000. All these hidden charges always makes me think twice when dealing with these brokerage institutions. I remember a friend used to describe these brokerage firms and investment bankers- &#8220;They are just like vultures.&#8221; How true, their life support system depends on the cut they get out of investors, regardless if they add value or not. Anyway, that&#8217;s my last trade with OSK.</p>
<p>Need to look for a new trading platform, and it seems <a href="https://www.jupiteronline.com.my/jssbecos/default.asp">Jupiter Securities Sdn Bhd</a> is highly recommended amongst fellow traders in Malaysia. Am in the process of opening an account with them now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/11/trading-notes-for-2010-08-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Oscillators</title>
		<link>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/07/using-oscillators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/07/using-oscillators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alexander Elder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Momentum Oscillators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Wisdoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danavest.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rule of thumb with oscillators, when in doubt make them shorter. This is the opposite to trend-following indicators, when in doubt make them longer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rule of thumb with oscillators, when in doubt make them shorter. This is the opposite to trend-following indicators, when in doubt make them longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danavest.com/2010/08/07/using-oscillators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
